Borys Kormych*
Tetiana Averochkina**
The 5th Anniversary of Lex Portus Journal: Emerging Transnational Law of Supply Chains
Suggested citation:
Kormych, B., & Averochkina, T. (2021). The 5th Anniversary of Lex Portus Journal: Emerging Transnational Law of Supply Chains. Lex Portus, 7(5), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.7.5.2021.1
*Editor-in-Chief, Professor, Head of the Department of Maritime and Customs Law, National University “Odessa Law Academy” (23, Fontanska Doroga, Odessa, Ukraine)
**Scientific Editor, Professor, Department of Maritime and Customs Law, National University “Odessa Law Academy” (23, Fontanska Doroga, Odessa, Ukraine)
REFERENCES
Austers A. (2016). From the EU’s Economic Presence to Successful Europeanisation: Theoretical Insights. In A. Austers, I. Bruge, A. Spruds (Eds.). Dilemmas of Europeanisation: Political Choices and Economic Transformations in the Eastern Partnership Countries. (pp. 13-39). Latvian Institute of International Affairs and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Chen, J. (2020). Tension and Rivalry: The ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative, Global Governance, and International Law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8, 1, 177-196. DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa009
Gayk, A., Naujoke, E., & Kormych, B. (2021). Harmonization of Procedures Is Still Work in Progress. WCO News, 94, 58-61.
Kormych, A., & Zavalniuk, V. (2020). Eastern Partnership Association Agreements in the Mirror of Global Ungovernance: Where Does the DCFTA Lead? Lex Portus, 6, 26, 35-58. DOI: 10.26886/2524-101X.6.2020.2
Kril, R. (2021). Common Transit Procedure and NCTS Implementation: the Case of Ukraine. Lex Portus, 7(3), 32-59. DOI: 10.26886/2524-101X.7.3.2021.2
Ladeur, K.H. (2012). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation. Transnational Legal Theory, 3, 3, 243-267. DOI: 10.5235/20414005.3.3.243
Lee, J. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative under Existing Trade Agreements: Some Food for Thought on a New Regional Integration Scheme. In Y. Zhao (Ed.). International Governance and the Rule of Law in China under the Belt and Road Initiative. (pp. 59-80). Cambridge University Press.
Lyte, E. (2007). The Delian Purple and the lex portus Asiae. Phoenix, 61, 3/4, 247-269. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20304658
Martin, J. (2021). A Transnational Law of the Sea. Chicago Journal of International Law, 21, 2, art. 6, 419-475. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol21/iss2/6
Nurgozhayeva, R. (2020). Rule-Making, Rule-Taking or Rule-Rejecting under the Belt and Road Initiative: A Central Asian Perspective. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8, 1, 197-223. DOI 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa006
Ogereau, J.M. (2012). Customs Law of the Roman Province of Asia (lex Portorii Asiae). In S.R. Llewelyn, & J.R. Harrison (Eds.). New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity. (Vol. 10, pp. 95-109). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Schrijver, N. (2016). Managing the global commons: common good or common sink? Third World Quarterly, 37, 7, 1252-1267. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1154441
Sweet, A.S. (2006). The new Lex Mercatoria and transnational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 5, 627-646. DOI: 10.1080/13501760600808311
Van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143-171.
Wang, H. (2021). The belt and road initiative agreements: Characteristics, rationale, and challenges. World Trade Review, 20, 3, 282-305. DOI: 10.1017/S1474745620000452
Wang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2021). Relational governance in rhetoric and reality: explanations and problems of China’s Belt and Road Initiative from the relational perspective. Globalizations, 18, 4, 650-666. DOI 10.1080/14747731.2020.1832838
Xi urges breaking new ground in major country diplomacy with Chinese characteristics (2018, June 24). Xinhua. http://xinhuanet.com/english/2018-06/24/c_137276269.htm
Zhou, J. (2020). A New Multilateralism? A Case Study of the Belt and Road Initiative. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8, 2, 384-413. DOI 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa022
