Una Aleksandra Berzina-Cerenkova*
The Baltic Resilience to China’s “Divide and Rule”
Suggested citation:
Berzina-Cerenkova, U.A. (2021). The Baltic Resilience to China’s “Divide and Rule”. Lex Portus, (7)2, 11-38. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.7.2.2021.2
*Head of Riga Stradins University China Studies Centre, Head of the Asia Programme, Latvian Institute of International Affairs (21 Pils street, LV-1050, Riga, Republic of Latvia).
ABSTRACT
The article examines the interactions of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania with China in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) format. First, it explores three most widespread criticisms of the Chinese BRI approach, namely: 1. The risk of Beijing becoming legitimating factor for strains on democracy, freedom and the rule of law; 2. Support towards the Chinese interpretation of values and tolerance of censorship; 3. Debt arising from infrastructure loans. Further, the article tries to establish to what extent did the Baltic states remain resilient to them, offering possible explanations to the Baltic cases along three lines – systemic resilience, discursive resilience, and financial resilience. The article concludes that BRI is taking different shapes in different regions, and that local political culture along with wider supra-national organizations determines the range and response to BRI, therefore, national institutional frameworks in combination with overwatch from supranational standard-enforcing institutions are the leading factors of countries’ resilience to risks stemming from BRI. Methodologically, the article employs qualitative approaches to data, including discourse analysis, document analysis and historic analysis. The primary sources include documents, agreements and statements of officials from China, the Baltic states, Italy, and the EU, as well as secondary sources including research publications, media reports, and mutually comparable national data.
The key words: Belt and Road, China, Baltic states, resilience, institutions.
REFERENCES
A snapshot of Chinese government influence, 2020. Nations in transit 2020. Dropping the Democratic Façade. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/05062020_FH_NIT2020_vfinal.pdf
Baltics snub China’s Eastern Europe summit, 2021. LRT. https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1338967/baltics-snub-china-s-eastern-europe-summit
Berzina-Cerenkova, U.A. (2018). China’s New Role in the Baltic States. The Baltic Bulletin. https://www.fpri.org/contributor/una-aleksandra-berzina-cerenkova/
Che, L. (2021). The Chinese Conception of the Rule of Law and Its Embodiment Under the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative (BRI). Journal of World Trade, 55, 1, 171-196. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/55.1/TRAD2021007
China, Malta sign MoU for B&R cooperation, 2018. Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the Republic of Malta. http://mt.china-embassy.org/eng/xwtp/t1611463.htm
China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for the OSCE. OSCE Network. https://osce-network.net/projects-activities/detail/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-implications-for-the-osce-1
China’s Policy Paper on the EU: Deepen the China-EU Comprehensive Strategic Partnership for Mutual Benefit and Win-win Cooperation, 2014. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/wjzcs/t1143406.shtml
Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (2008/C 155/02), 2008. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:155:0010:0022:EN:PDF
Estonia Overall Score, 2020. WJP Rule of Law Index, World Justice Project. https://www.worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/country/Estonia
EU-China – A strategic outlook, 2019. European Commission and HR/VP contribution to the European Council. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/communication-eu-china-a-strategic-outlook.pdf
FM attends reception to mark 70 years of diplomatic ties with 7 CEE countries, 2019. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. http://english.www.gov.cn/statecouncil/wangyi/201910/17/content_WS5da7da38c6d0bcf8c4c1545a.html
How to present China’s core socialist values to the global community, 2019. CGTN. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-10-31/How-to-present-China-s-core-socialist-values-to-the-global-community-LeL7qWCgPS/index.html
Huotari, M. (@m_huotari) (2020, May 17). Tweet. Executive Director, Mercator Institute for China Studies. Twitter. https://twitter.com/m_huotari/status/1259907985888993288
In visit to China, OSCE PA President Muttonen highlights areas of mutual interest, future co-operation, 2017. OSCE press release. https://www.osce.org/parliamentary-assembly/322896
Index details. Data of press freedom ranking 2020. Reporters Without Borders. https://rsf.org/en/ranking
Inotai, E. (2020). Budapest to Belgrade: all aboard the secret express. The Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/22/budapest-to-belgrade-all-aboard-the-secret-express/
Jakučionis, S. (2019). Chinese investment into Klaipėda port a ‘concern’ for national security, president says. LRT. https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1083021/chinese-investment-into-klaipeda-port-a-concern-for-national-security-president-says
Letter to the United Nations Office at Geneva addressed to the President of the Human Rights Council, July 8, 2019 (the Permanent Representatives of Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland). Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/supporting_resources/190708_joint_statement_xinjiang.pdf
Lithuania mulls leaving China’s 17+1 forum, expanding links with Taiwan, 2021. LRT. https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/1356107/lithuania-mulls-leaving-china-s-17plus1-forum-expanding-links-with-taiwan
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the Italian Republic and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on Cooperation Within the Framework of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative”, 2019). Governo Italiano. http://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/Memorandum_Italia-Cina_EN.pdf
National and EU Contribution. Rail Baltica project official website. http://www.railbaltica.org/about-rail-baltica/finances/
Pētījums par ekonomisko un sociālo situāciju Baltijas valstīs – Latvija, 2013. Eiropas Ekonomikas un sociālo lietu komiteja. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/qe-30-12-151-lv-c.pdf
Poggetti, L., & Weidenfeld, J. (2018). China seems to tone down its 16+1 engagement: three possible explanations. Merics. https://www.merics.org/en/blog/china-seems-tone-down-its-161-engagement-three-possible-explanations
Protokollēmuma projekts “Par Latvijas Republikas valdības un Ķīnas Tautas Republikas valdības saprašanās memorandu par sadarbību Zīda ceļa ekonomiskās joslas un 21.gadsimta jūras zīda ceļa iniciatīvas ietvaros”, 2016. Latvijas Republikas Ministru Kabinets. http://tap.mk.gov.lv/mk/tap/?pid=40402866
Quinn, E. (2020). Estonian minister calls Finnish developer’s Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel plan overly “optimistic”. Eye on the Arctic. https://www.rcinet.ca/eye-on-the-arctic/2020/08/04/estonian-minister-calls-finnish-developers-helsinki-tallinn-tunnel-plan-overly-optimistic/
Secret Supplementary Protocols of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-Aggression Pact, 1939. History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Published in Nazi-Soviet Relations, 1939-1941: Documents from the Archives of the German Foreign Office. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/110994
Sytas, A. (2020). Baltic states impose sanctions on Lukashenko and other Belarus officials. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-belarus-election-sanctions-idUSKBN25R0Z7
Tallinn-Helsinki rail tunnel secures 15 billion euros of funding, 2019. Emerging Europe. https://emerging-europe.com/news/tallinn-helsinki-rail-tunnel-secures-15-billion-euros-of-funding/
The Sofia Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries, 2018. Ministry of the Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/2649_665393/t1577455.shtml
Trust in the European Union: national results and evolutions. Public opinion in the European Union, Standard Eurobarometer 91 Spring 2019.
Unemployment Rate, Europe. Data for the 3nd quarter of 2019. Eurostat. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/unemployment-rate?continent=europe
United States Strategic Approach to The People’s Republic of China, 2020. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/U.S.-Strategic-Approach-to-The-Peoples-Republic-of-China-Report-5.20.20.pdf
Weidenfeld, J., & Huotari, M. (2016). Why the EU should use the OSCE to engage China on security issues. Mercator Institute for China Studies. https://www.merics.org/en/blog/why-eu-should-use-osce-engage-china-security-issues
Wen, J. (2012). China’s 12 Friendly Measures for Promoting Friendly Cooperation with Central and Eastern European Countries. Measure 2. Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. http://www.china-ceec.org/eng/ldrhw_1/2012hs/hdxw/t1410546.htm
Wike, R. (2010). Hungary Dissatisfied with Democracy, but Not Its Ideals. Pew Research Institute. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2010/04/07/hungary-dissatisfied-with-democracy-but-not-its-ideals/
Wike, R., Poushter, J., Silver, L., Devlin, K., Fetterolf, J., Castillo, A., & Huang, C. (2019). European Public Opinion Three Decades After the Fall of Communism. Pew Research Institute. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/15/european-public-opinion-three-decades-after-the-fall-of-communism/
Wolff, S. (2021). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for the OSCE. OSCE Network of Think Tanks and Academic Institutions. https://osce-network.net/fileadmin/user_upload/publications/China-BRI-Report-2021-fin.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Zw7UpJPtX8dajojrkvl-SpraqQTeYJSqAV65Z9bgakNmHRNhrCegAIZk
Zhou, L. (2018). Heritage and Innovation of Core Socialist Values. China Today. http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/ctenglish/2018/br/201803/t20180308_800120759.html
中国关键词, 2016. [China’s Keywords, 2016]. Xin Shijie Publishing. Beijing. [in Chinese].
胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告(全文). [Full text of Hu Jintao’s report at 17th Party Congress]. CPC News, 2007. http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/104019/104099/6429414.html [in Chinese].
“希腊赋能’中国—中东欧国家合作’)”, 中国社会科学网, 大变局下的 ‘中国-中东欧国家合作, 国际问题研究, no. 2, 2020. [Liu, Z.]. Referenced in: Justyna Szczudlik, ”China Trends #5 – “17+1”: Overriding the Complaints”, Institut Montaigne, June 5, 2020. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/china-trends-5-171-overriding-complaints [in Chinese].
习近平谈治国理智, 2014. [Xi Jinping talks about governing the country and managing politics, 2014]. Foreign Languages Press. Beijing. [in Chinese].
富强、民主、文明、和谐,自由、平等、公正、法治,爱国、敬业、诚信、友善. [“社会主义核心价值观基本内容,” 2014. Communist Party of China News Portal, Source: Renmin Ribao. http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/0212/c40531-24330538.html [in Chinese].