Archive Issues of the Journal

Gediminas Valantiejus*

Conflicts of international and national customs law with EU customs law: the example of the Republic of Lithuania

Full text PDF [EN]

Suggested citation:

Valantiejus, G. (2020). Conflicts of international and national customs law with EU customs law: the example of the Republic of Lithuania. Lex Portus, no. 2, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.2.2020.2

*Gediminas Valantiejus, Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Mykolas Romeris University (20, Ateities St., Vilnius, Lithuania).

 

ABSTRACT

The article examines the functioning of the modern customs regulatory environment for the EU Member States, which is composed of three levels of sources: international legal instruments, EU primary and secondary legislation and national legislation of individual Member States. However, the practical application of these provisions is related to conflicts between the sources of national and international law and even the different sources of international law itself. It should be noted that at the present time, individual states have not yet formed a unified approach on whether the WTO Agreements should have a direct effect in their national legal system, as most of the states are following the doctrine of dualism and deny this possibility, although the practices followed by the national courts of the Republic of Lithuania have shown the elements of a monistic approach to this problem. The increasing use of international preferential trade agreements and the prevalence of agreements, which establish the customs unions, could also be regarded as a challenge to the development of international economic law and international trade system. Moreover, analysis of the judicial practices of national courts (in the Republic of Lithuania) and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed that an explicit approach to the relationship existing between international, EU and national customs law has not yet materialized.

The key words: international trade, international customs law, World Trade Organization Agreements, Union Customs Code, Republic of Lithuania.

 

REFERENCES

Brita, C-386/08, EU:C:2010:91 (1993).

Bronckers, M. (2008). From Direct Effect to “Muted Dialogue” – Recent Developments in the European Courts’ Case Law on the WTO and Beyond. Journal of International Economic Law, 11(4), 885-898.

Council Decision No. 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994). (1994). OJ. L 336, 1-2.

Costa, C-6/64, EU:C:1964:66 (1964).

Denmark C-329/02, EU:C:2004:532 (2004).

Deutsche Shell, C-188/91, EU:C:1993:24 (1993).

De Santa Cruz Oliveira, J.M.A. (2015). International Trade Agreements Before Domestic Courts. Lessons from the EU and Brazilian experiences. Dordrecht. Springer International Publishing.

Douaneagent der NV Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Case C-38/75, EU:C:1975:154 (1975).

Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union, C-280/93, EU:C:1994:367 (1994)

France, C-267/94, EU:C:1995:453 (1995).

IKEA Wholesale Ltd, C-351/04, EU:C:2007:547 (2007).

Internacionale Handelsgesellschaft GmbH, Case C-11/70, EU:C:1970:114 (1970).

International Fruit Company, C-21/72-24/72, EU:C:1972:115 (1972).

Kawasaki Motors Europe NV, C-15/05, EU:C:2006:259 (2006).

Kupferberg, C-104/81, EU:C:1982:362 (1982).

Heijmann, F.H.A., Mulder, H. (2005). Europos Sąjungos muitų teisė. Europos Sąjungos teisė. Seminarai. Vilnius. [in Lithuanian].

Herdegen, M. (2013). Principles of International Economic Law. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Hojnik, J. (2012). The EU Internal Market and National Tradition and Culture: any Room for Market Decentralization? Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, 8, 117-142.

Laurinavicius, A., et al. (2014). Muitinė tarptautinės prekybos logistinėje grandinėje. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio Universitetas. [in Lithuanian].

Leal-Arcas, R. (2010). The European Union’s Trade and Investment Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon. The Journal of World Investment and Trade, 11, 463-514.

Leal-Arcas, R. (2011). International Trade and Investment Law. Multilateral, Regional and Bilateral Governance. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

L.O. komercinė firma v. Customs Department under the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. (2012) Case No. A261-1303/2012.

Law on Customs of the Republic of Lithuania, 2004. Official Gazette, 73-2517.

Lux, M. (2007). EU Customs law and international law. World Customs Journal, 1(1), 19-29.

Lyons, T. (2008). EC Customs law. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Medeliene, A., Sudavicius, B. (2011). Mokesciu teise. Vilnius. Registru centras. [in Lithuanian].

Order on the Development of Lithuanian Exports in 2014–2020 approval of the guidelines, 2014 (Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania). TAR. 2015-05-22, 7782.

OGT Fruchthandelsgesellschaft GmbH, C-307/99, EU:C:2001:228 (2001).

R.V. individuali imone v. Vilnius territorial customs. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (2008) Case No. A261-939/2008.

Radziukynas, J., Belzus, A. (2008). Importuojamu prekiu muitinis ivertinimas ir kontrole. Vilnius: Lietuvos prekybos, pramones ir amatų rumai. [in Lithuanian].

Racke, C-162/96, EU:C:1998:293 (1998).

Regulation laying down the Union Customs Code, 2013 (European Parliament, Council). OJ L 269, 1-101.

Rovetta, D. (2010). Are Tariff Explanatory Notes Subject to Judicial Supremacy? Global Trade and Customs Journal, 5(3), 129-132.

Skoma Lux, C-161/06, EU:C:2007:773 (2007).

The Air Transport Association of America and Others, C-366/10, EU:C:2011:637 (2011).

Terra, B.J.M., Wattel, P.J. (2012). European Tax Law. The Hague. Kluwer Law International.

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version), 2008. OJ. C 326.

UAB Energetikos tiekimo baze v. Customs Department under the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (2008). Case No. A525-932/2008.

UAB Kauno MTA v. Customs Department under the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (2011). Case No. A575-144/2011

UAB Kustodija v. Customs Department of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (2013). Case No. A442-1156/2013.

UAB “Transchema” v. Customs Department of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (2013). Case No. A442-709/2013.

UAB “Urlavila” v. Customs Department of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania (2013). Case No. A442-220/2011.

Van Gend & Loos, C-26/62, EU:C:1963:1 (1963).

Valantiejus, G. (2013). Prie-trial settlement of disputes with customs in Lithuania: devel­opment of legal regulations, it’s problems and prospects. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society: proceedings of an international scientific conference. Vilnius. Retrieved April, 3, 2020, from: http://stics.mruni.eu

Wolffgang, H.M., Ovie, T. (2008). Emerging Issues in European Customs Law – Part 3. World Customs Journal, 2(1), 3-17.

Wolffgang, H.M. (2007). Emerging issues in European Customs Law. World Customs Journal, 1(1), 3-10.

.

Адрес редакции

г. Одесса,
Фонтанская дорога, 23
Национальный университет «Одесская юридическая академия»,
кафедра морского и таможенного права

fb

info@lexportus.net.ua