Tuesday, 05 July 2022

Iurii Usmanov*

Marta Chernychka**

Maritime Autonomous Weapon Systems from the Standpoint of International Humanitarian Law

Full text PDF [EN]

Suggested citation:

Usmanov, Iu., & Chernychka, M. (2022). Maritime Autonomous Weapon Systems from the Standpoint of International Humanitarian Law. Lex Portus, 8(2), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.8.2.2022.2

*PhD, Director of the Institute of International Relations at the Kyiv International University (49, Lvivska St., Kyiv, Ukraine)

**Institute of International Relations at the Kyiv International University (49, Lvivska St., Kyiv, Ukraine)

 

ABSTRACT

Modern armed conflicts demonstrate constant military transformation, and the weapon of the future will be precisely what we now name by the word “autonomous weapon systems” (AWS). Despite many advantages of using it, the possibility of lawful use of AWS and especially unmanned maritime systems as a kind of AWS remains a debatable issue in international law. It is primarily due to the loss of human control over the use of lethal force and the autonomy of such systems. AWS are already widely used by many countries, including Israel, the US, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and others, to protect their borders, increasing the response times and effectiveness of border forces both on land and at sea. Authors highlight a list of issues, namely the absence of the conventional definition of the term “autonomous weapon systems”, the possibility of individual prosecution due to the misuse of AWS, the protection of human life, privacy and appropriate remedies, the compliance of the use of AWS with the principles of distinction between civilians and combatants, military necessity and proportionality, precautions, etc. The problems of using autonomous weapon systems lie in both legal and ethical areas. Such uncertainty automatically narrows the protection of human rights in armed conflicts, which is unacceptable and illegal. Therefore, it is proposed at the regulatory level to prohibit states from using fully autonomous weapon systems and unmanned maritime systems as a kind of AWS that could use lethal force against humans, as well as to provide for the definition of AWS, their types, and principles of use, clearly define and limit their scope within which states could guarantee respect for human rights, as they are responsible for compliance with IHL and international human rights law.

The keywords: autonomous weapon systems, AWS, drones, naval warfare, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, the law of the armed conflict.

 

REFERENCES

Al-Haj, A. (2013). Officials: US, drone strike kills 13 in Yemen. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/officials-us-drone-strike-kills-13-in-yemen/2013/12/12/3b070f0a-6375-11e3-91b3-f2bb96304e34_story.html

Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the development of autonomy in weapon systems. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-11/siprireport_mapping_the_development_of_autonomy_in_weapon_systems_1117_1.pdf

Brehm, M. (2017). Defending the Boundary: Constraints and Requirements on the Use of Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. Geneva Academy Briefing, 9. https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Briefing9_interactif.pdf

Brzozowski, A. (2019). No progress in UN talks on regulating lethal autonomous weapons. EURACTIV. https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/no-progress-in-un-talks-on-regulating-lethal-autonomous-weapons

Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, 1980. https://geneva-s3.unoda.org/static-unoda-site/pages/templates/the-convention-on-certain-conventional-weapons/CCW%2Btext.pdf

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, 1992. UN Office of Disarmament Affairs. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/cwc

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, 1972. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/450

Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, 1997. https://geneva-s3.unoda.org/static-unoda-site/pages/templates/anti-personnel-landmines-convention/APLC%2BEnglish.pdf

Customary IHL. (2005). International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule1

Dinstein, Y., & Dahl, A.W. (2020). Oslo Manual on Select Topics of the Law of Armed Conflict. Springer Nature. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/39564/2020_Book_OsloManualOnSelectTopicsOfTheL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Ekelhof, M. (2018). Autonomous weapons: Operationalizing meaningful human control. Humanitarian Law & Policy. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2018/08/15/autonomous-weapons-operationalizing-meaningful-human-control/Hammond, D.N. (2015). Autonomous Weapons and the Problem of State Accountability. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15(2). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1085&context=cjil

Geneva Convention (I) on Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/full/GCI-commentary

Geneva Convention (II) on Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked of Armed Forces at Sea, 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/full/GCII-commentary

Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/full/GCIII-commentary  

Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/380

Heim, E., Sassòli, M., & Issar, Y. (2019). Iraq/Syria/UK, Drone Operations against ISIS. ICRC, Casebook. https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/iraqsyriauk-drone-operations-against-isis

Heyns, Ch. (2013). Report of the on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions. (UN Doc A/HRC/23/47). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/127/76/PDF/G1312776.pdf?OpenElement

ICJ. (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion). https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/95/7646.pdf

ICRC Expert Meeting. (2014, May 9). Report on autonomous weapon systems: technical, military, legal and humanitarian aspects. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/2014/expert-meeting-autonomous-weapons-icrc-report-2014-05-09.pdf

ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems. (2021, May 12). International Committee of the Red Cross. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-position-autonomous-weapon-systems

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2019). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in armed conflict: A human-centred approach. https://www.icrc.org/en/download/file/96992/ai_and_machine_learning_in_armed_conflict-icrc.pdf

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2018, April 3). Ethics And Autonomous Weapon Systems: An Ethical Basis For Human Control?. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ethics-and-autonomous-weapon-systems-ethical-basis-human-control

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2019, November 22). International humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/document/file_list/challenges-report_new-technologies-of-warfare.pdf

International Committee of the Red Cross. (2016, April 11). Views on autonomous weapon systems. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/views-icrc-autonomous-weapon-system

International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf

International Criminal Court. (2009). The Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (2009). PTC II, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges. (No. ICC-01/05-01/08-424). ICC Legal Tools Database. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/07965c/

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. (2002). The Prosecutor v. Ignace Bagilishema. AC, Appeal Judgement. (No. ICTR-95-1A-A. (2002). ICC Legal Tools Database. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ebc505/

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (1998). The Prosecutor v. Mucic et al. TC, Judgement. (No. IT-96-21-T). ICC Legal Tools Database. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/6b4a33/

Panel of Experts on Libya established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1973. (2021). Final report. (UN Doc S/2021/229). https://undocs.org/S/2021/229

Perrigo, B. (2018). A Global Arms Race for Killer Robots Is Transforming the Battlefield. Time. https://time.com/5230567/killer-robots/

Protocol IV to the CCW Convention (Protocol IV on Blinding Laser Weapons), 1995. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/570

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 1977. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 1977. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://cutt.ly/DHZorLB

Ray, T. (2018). Beyond the ‘Lethal’ in Lethal Autonomous Weapons: Applications of LAWS in Theatres of Conflict for Middle Powers. Observer Research Foundation. No. 180. https://www.orfonline.org/research/beyond-the-lethal-in-lethal-autonomous-weapons-applications-of-laws-in-theatres-of-conflict-for-middle-powers-46259/

Sandoz, Y., Swinarski, Ch., & Zimmermann, B. (1987). Commentary on the Additional Protocols of June 08 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of August 12 1949. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/Commentary_GC_Protocols.pdf

Schmitt, M.N., & Goddard, D.S. (2017). International law and the military use of unmanned maritime systems. International Review of the Red Cross, 98(2), 567-592. https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irc98_10.pdf

Singer, P.W. (2009). Military Robots and the Laws of War. The New Atlantis. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/military-robots-and-the-laws-of-war

The Congressional Research Service. (2021). International Discussions Concerning Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. FAS Project on Government Secrecy. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/IF11294.pdf

The German Federal Constitutional Court. (2006). Aviation Security Act Case: BVerfG, 1 BvR 357/05. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2006/bvg06-011.html

The Martens Clause>. Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, 1907. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/xsp/.ibmmodres/domino/OpenAttachment/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/4D47F92DF3966A7EC12563CD002D6788/FULLTEXT/IHL-19-EN.pdf

UN.(2019). Guiding Principles affirmed by the Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons System. https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2020/02/UN-191213_CCW-MSP-Final-report-Annex-III_Guiding-Principles-affirmed-by-GGE.pdf

U.S. Department of Defense. (2014). Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2013-2038. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=747559

Usmanov, I.I. (2021). The Right to Life in Conditions of Armed Conflicts and Situations of Internal Violence. Kyiv. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Rys1EAAAQBAJ [in Ukrainian].

Velez-Green, A. (2015). The Foreign Policy Essay: The South Korean Sentry – A “Killer Robot” to Prevent War. Lawfareblog. https://www.lawfareblog.com/foreign-policy-essay-south-korean-sentry%E2%80%94-killer-robot-prevent-war

Wareham, M. (2019, June 28). Statement to the CCW Consultation on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/06/28/statement-ccw-consultation-lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems

.

Editorial Board Address

Ukraine, Odesa, Fontanska Doroga, 23
National University “Odessa Academy of Law”,
Department of Maritime and Customs Law

fb

info@lexportus.net.ua