Enrika Naujokė*
EU’s Preferential Trade Agreements: Why Lithuanian Firms Underutilize Them?
Suggested citation:
Naujokė, E. (2022). EU’s Preferential Trade Agreements: Why Lithuanian Firms Underutilize Them? Lex Portus, 8(4), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.8.4.2022.1
*Customs brokerage company UAB “Muita” (Mariu str. 17, LT-93264 Klaipeda, Lithuania)
ABSTRACT
It takes many years to negotiate a Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA). The goal is the economic benefits that utilization of PTAs brings. However, the European Commission found that utilization of some PTAs is very low. This study aimed to reveal what obstacles firms face and to recommend solutions. A literature review was done, and semi-structured interviews were conducted (eight participants were selected using the convenience sampling technique). The research questions were about the extent Lithuanian companies utilize PTAs, what they consider obstacles and how these can be overcome. The review of the literature revealed seven main issues. Semi-structured interviews highlighted one more important issue. One of the most significant issues revealed is the lack of interest of the Lithuanian customs administration in promoting PTAs’ utilization.
The keywords: Preferential Trade Agreements, traders, customs administration, obstacles, rules of origin, harmonization.
REFERENCES
Ahearn, R.J. (2011, March). Europe’s Preferential Trade Agreements: Status, Content, and Implications. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41143.pdf
Baldwin, R. (1993). A domino theory of regionalism. NBER Working Paper No. 4465, National bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge.
Battisti, M., Jurado, T., & Perry, M. (2014). Understanding small-firm reactions to free trade agreements. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-10-2013-0151
Cadot, O., Carrère, C., de Melo, J. & Tumurchudur, B. (2006). Product-specific rules of origin in EU and US preferential trading arrangements: an assessment. World Trade Review, 5, 2, 199-224. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745606002758
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2011). Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen v. Afasia Knits Deutschland GmbH. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&jur=C,T,F&num=C-409/10&td=ALL
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2017). Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v. Aqua Pro SIA. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=196123&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10459824
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2017). Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v. Veloserviss SIA. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=188964&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10460232
Crook, W., & Gordon, J. (2017, March). Rules of Origin: can the noodle bowl of trade agreements be untangled? https://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/rules-of-origin
DIHK Deutsche Industrie-und Handelskammer. (2020, August). Concept Paper for Modern Trade Agreements - Increasing Utilisation of Preferential Customs Tariffs. Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag
Estevadeordal, A., & Suominen, K. (2004). Rules of Origin: A World Map and Trade Effects. The Seventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228798990_Rules_of_Origin_A_World_Map_and_Trade_Effects
EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:22017A0114(01)
European Commission. (2003). Green paper on the future of rules of origin in preferential trade agreements. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d6a65c64-b6ca-4323-9f3c-3e43c3f41a86/language-en
European Commission. (2017). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements 1 January 2016 - 31 December 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0654
European Commission. (2018). Results of the Survey on Rules of Origin 2018 Executive Summary.
European Commission. (2020). 2020 Annual Report on the Implementation of EU Trade Agreements. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2020/november/tradoc_159042.pdf
Hiratsuka, D., Isono, I., Sato, H., & Umezaki, S. (2008). Escaping from FTA Trap and Spaghetti Bowl Problem in East Asia: An Insight from the Enterprise Survey in Japan. The ASEAN Economic Community and Beyond-, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-1-2, Chiba: IDE-JETRO, 304-327. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Research-Project-Report/RPR_FY2007_1-2_Chapter_16.pdf
International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures, 2008 (Revised Kyoto Convention). http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/instrument-and-tools/conventions/pf_revised_kyoto_conv/kyoto_new.aspx
Jung, M. (2016). Compliance für Zoll und Außenhandel. Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH.
Lukaszuk, P., & Legge, S. (2019). Which Factors Determine the Utilization of Preferential Tariff Rates? Jahrestagung des Vereins für Sozialpolitik.
Manchin, M., & Pelkmans-Balaoing, A. (2007). Clothes without an emperor: analysis of the preferential tariffs in Asean. Journal of Asian Economics, 19, 3, 2013-23.
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3450/text
Ornelas, E., Turner, J.L., & Bickwit, G. (2021). Preferential trade agreements and global sourcing. Journal of International Economics, 128, 103395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103395
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements 1 January 2016 - 31 December 2016 (2017, November). https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2017)654&lang=en
Takahashi, K., & Urata, S. (2009). On the Use of Free Trade Agreements by Japanese Firms. Free Trade Agreements in the Asia Pacific, 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814271394_0007
Takahashi, K., & Urata, S. (2010). On the Use of FTAs by Japanese Firms: Further Evidence. Business and Politics, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1310
The OLAF report 2018. https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/olaf_report_2018_en.pdf
UNCTAD. (2018, January 29). $89 billion lost in underuse of European Union free trade agreements, report shows. https://unctad.org/news/89-billion-lost-underuseeuropean-union-free-trade-agreements-report-shows
Vilnius Admistrative Court. (2017, February). Muitines departamentas v. UAB “Kotryna”. https://eteismai.lt/byla/222396092481627/I-738-426/2017
WCO. (2017, May 5). First WCO Global Origin Conference held in Africa [Press release]. http://www.wcoomd.org/en/media/newsroom/2017/may/firstwco-global-origin-conference-held-in-africa.aspx
Yi, J. (2015). Rules of Origin and the Use of Free Trade Agreements: a Literature Review. World Customs Journal.
