Prince Obiri-Korang*
Primary Connecting Factors Considered by South African Courts to Determine the Applicable Law of International Contracts on the Sale of Goods
Suggested citation:
Obiri-Korang, P. (2022). Primary Connecting Factors Considered by South African Courts to Determine the Applicable Law of International Contracts on the Sale of Goods. Lex Portus, 8(5), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.8.5.2022.1
*Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Research Centre for Private International Law in Emerging Countries, Faculty of Law, University of Johannesburg (Cnr. Kingsway & University Roads, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, 2092, South Africa)
ABSTRACT
Issues on choice of law are sometimes very complex, and the resulting outcome may be determinative of most litigations. This is especially true where the litigation concerns cross-border transactions involving states with diverse laws and different legal traditions. Thus, it is important for parties to be able to accurately predict the applicable law of their international sales contract in advance to enable them to plan the activities relating to their contracts with certainty. The existence of uncertainty with regard to the applicable law in most legal systems (especially at common law) makes it difficult for contracting parties to plan or resolve disputes that may arise from their commercial contracts, either by themselves or by the court. This situation is an unpleasant one which presents an undesirable state of affairs to the business world. At common law, although it is true that the legal certainty required with respect to the applicable law of international commercial contracts can be achieved by a choice of law clause, it should be noted that most of such contracts do not contain this clause. This article attempts to contribute to existing literature on choice of law for contract in South Africa and also provide solutions, based on the underlying principles of private international law of contract, that effectively address the uncertainty in this area of law. To achieve its task, the article examines the various connecting factors considered by the South African courts in determining the applicable law (also, the proper law or governing law) of international contracts in situations where the parties do not insert a choice of law clause in their international contracts for sale of goods. The factors considered in this regard include the place of conclusion of contract, domicile, habitual residence and place of performance. These factors, in most situations, serve as the primary connecting factors considered by the courts in arriving at an answer with regard to the objective proper law/applicable law of an international sale contract (and other international commercial contracts) in South Africa. Further, the article examines why it is important for South African courts, and common law courts in general, to even go through the exercise of determining the applicable law in matters of international commercial disputes and not simply rely on the lex fori in dealing with such litigations (since, a lex fori approach might be much easier).
The keywords: international contracts on the sale of goods, international commercial contracts, private international law of contract, common law, applicable law of an international contract, lex causae, lex fori, lex loci contractus, lex domicilii, law of the habitual residence, lex loci solutionis.
REFERENCES
Allen, W.H., & O’Hara, E.A. (1999). Second generation law and economics of conflict of laws: Baxter’s comparative impairment and beyond. Stanford Law Review, 51(5), 1011–1048. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229405
Australia, Akai Pty Ltd v. The People’s Insurance Co (1996) 188 CLR 418.
Beale, J.H. (1916). A Treatise on The Conflict of Laws or Private International Law. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674733053
Canada, Imperial Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Colmenares 1967 SCR 443, 62 DLR (2d) 138, 1967 CarswellOnt 65.
Canada, Lilydale Cooperative Limited v. Meyn Canada Inc 2015 ONCA 281.
Canada, Tolofson v. Jensen 1994 3 RCS 1022.
Cavers, D.F. (1971). Habitual residence: A useful concept? American University Law Review, 21(3), 475–493.
Cavers, D.F. (1965). The Choice of Law Process. University of Michigan Press.
Collins, L.A., & Harris, J. (2022). Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws. Sweet & Maxwell.
D’Amato, A. (1983). Legal uncertainty. California Law Review, 71(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480139
De Winter, L.I. (1969). Nationality or domicile? The present state of affairs. Recueil Des Cours, 128(3), 346–504.
Dicey, A.V. (1879). The Law of Domicile as a Branch of the Law of England: Stated in the Form of Rules. Stevens and Sons.
Dowuona-Hammond, C. (2011). The Contract Law of Ghana. Frontiers Printing and Publishing.
Edwards, A.B. (1984). Some reflections on the reception of the “proper law” doctrine into South African law. In J. Van der Westhuizen et al (Eds.), Huldigingsbundel Paul van Warmelo. University of South Africa.
European Union, Case C-386/05 Color Drack GmbH v. Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH 2005 ECR I - 3727.
European Union (Withdrawal) Act, 2018.
Fernández, J.E. (2019). Jurisdiction and applicable law to contracts for the sale of goods and the provision of services including the carriage of goods by sea and other means of transport in the European Union. Cuadernos De Derecho Transnacional, 11(2), 58–84.
Forsyth, C.F. (2012). Private International Law. Juta.
Fredericks, E.A., and Neels, J.L. (2003). The proper law of a documentary letter of credit (Part 1). South African Mercantile Law Journal, 15(1), 63–77.
Ghana, Godka Group of Companies v. P.S. International Ltd 1999-2000 1 GLR 409.
Ghei, N., & Parisi, F. (2004). Adverse selection and moral hazard in forum shopping: Conflicts laws as spontaneous order. Cardozo Law Review, 25(4), 1367–1392.
Giuliano, M., & Lagarde, P. (1980). Report on the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations by Mario Giuliano and Paul Lagarde. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1–50.
Guinea-Bissau Civil Code, 1973.
Hague Conference on Private International Law (2021). A world organization, HCCH. https://www.hcch.net
Hague Convention on Recognition of Divorces and Legal Separation, 1968.
Hakki, M.M. (2003). The European Union’s conflict of law rules governing contract law – A re-evaluation. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 10, 1–17.
Hay, B.L. (1992). Conflicts of law and state competition in the product liability system. Georgetown Law Journal, 80(1), 617–652.
Hay, P., Borchers, P.J., & Symeionides, S.C. (2010). Conflict of Laws. West Academic Publishing.
India, Modi Entertainment Network v. W.S.G. Cricket Pte Ltd 2003 4 SCC 341.
Japan General Rules of Application of Law, 2006.
Kahn, E. (2003). Conflict of Laws. LexisNexis Butterworths.
Khanderia, S. (2020). The ascertainment of the applicable law in the absence of choice in India and South Africa: a shared future in the BRICS. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 20(1), 27–51.
Lorenzen, G.E. (1928). The French rules of conflict of laws. Yale Law Journal, 38(2), 165–192.
Lin, T.Y. (2014). Good faith choice of a law to govern a contract. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 307–327.
Manko, R. (2013). ‘Habitual Residence’ as Connecting Factor in EU Civil Justice Measures. https://www.europarl.europa.eu
Mankowski, P. (2002). Europäisches Internationales Privat- und Prozessrecht im Lichte der ökonomischen Analyse. In C. Ott, & H.B. Schäfer (Eds.). Vereinheitlichung und Diversität des Zivilrechts in transnationalen Wirtschaftsräumen (pp. 118–151). Mohr Siebrek.
Marshall, B.A. (2012). Reconsidering the proper law of the contract. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 13(1), 505–539.
McLeod, J.G. (2006). The Meaning of Ordinary Residence and Habitual Residence in the Common Law Provinces in a Family Law Context. Presentation delivered at the Family, Children and Youth Section, Department of Justice Canada, Ontario.
Mortensen, R., Garnett, R., & Keyes, M. (2011). Private International Law in Australia. LexisNexis Butterworths.
Mousourakis, G. (2012). Fundamentals of Roman Private Law. Springer.
Nadelmann, H.K. (1986). Habitual residence and nationality as tests at the Hague: The 1968 Convention on Recognition of Divorces. Texas Law Review, 47(1), 766–789.
Nadelmann, H.K. (1969). Mancini’s nationality rule and non-unified legal systems: nationality versus domicile. American Journal of Comparative Law, 17(3), 418–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/839220
Neels, J.L. (2017). The role of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts in Indian and South African private international law. Uniform Law Review, 22(2), 443–451.
Neels, J.L., & Fredericks, E.A. (2018). An introduction to the African Principles of Commercial Private International Law. Stellenbosch Law Review, 29(2), 347–356.
Neels, J.L., & Fredericks E.A. (2011). Tacit choice of law in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Contracts. De Jure, 44(1), 101-110.
Neuhaus, P.H. (1963). Legal certainty versus equity in the conflict of laws. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(3), 795–807.
Nicholson, F.J. (1982). Conflict of Laws. Annual Survey of Massachusetts Law, 255–272.
Nishitani, Y. (2016). Party autonomy in contemporary private international law – The Hague Principles on Choice of Law and East Asia Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 59(1), 300–344.
Nussbaum, A. (1942). Conflict theories of contracts: cases versus restatement. The Yale Law Journal, 51(6), 893–923.
O’Hara, E.A., & Ribstein, L.E. (1999). Conflict of laws and choice of law. George Mason University School of Law Journal, 631–653.
O’Hara, E.A., & Ribstein, L.E. (2000). From politics to efficiency in choice of law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 67(4), 1151–1232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600456
Obiri-Korang, P. (2020). A re-examination of the conflict rules governing the validity of international contracts. Journal of Comparative Law in Africa, 7(2), 41–59.
Obiri-Korang, P. (2021). Party autonomy: promoting legal certainty and predictability in international commercial contracts through choice of law (Justification). Tydskrif Vir Die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2021, 1, 43–58.
Parisi, F., & O’Hara, E.A. (1998). Conflict of Laws. In Newman P. (Ed.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (pp. 387–395). Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul, J.R. (2008). The transformation of international comity. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(3), 19–38.
Perez-Vera, E. (1982). Explanatory Report on the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention. https://www.hcch.net
Pitel, S.G.A., & Rafferty, N. (2010). Conflict of Laws. Irwin Law.
Posner, R. (1998). Economic Analysis of Law. Aspen Law and Business.
Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I).
Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Rome II).
Schoeman, E., Roodt, C., & Wethmar-Lemmer, M. (2013). Private International Law in South Africa. Kluwer Law International.
Solimine, M. (1989). An economic and empirical analysis of choice of law. Georgia Law Review, 24(1), 49–93.
South Africa, Guggenheim v. Rosenbaum (2) 1961 (4) SA 21 (W).
South Africa, Improvair (Cape) (Pty) Ltd v. Establissements Neu 1983 2 SA 138 (C).
South Africa, Kleinhans v. Parmalat SA (Pty) Ltd 2002 ZALC 57.
South Africa, Laconian Maritime Enterprises Ltd v. Agromar Lineas Ltd 1986 3 SA 509 (D).
South Africa, Representatives of Lloyds v. Classic Sailing Adventures (Pty) Ltd 2010 (5) SA 90 (SCA).
South Africa, Standard Bank of South Africa v. Efroiken and Newman 1924 AD 171.
Spiro, E. (1973). Conflict of Laws. Juta.
Stone, P. (1995). The Conflict of Laws. Cambridge University Press.
Symeonides, S.C. (2013). The Hague Principles on Choice of Law for International Contracts: Some preliminary comments. American Journal of Competitive Law, 61(4), 873–899.
Szászy, S. (1966). The basic connecting factor in international cases in the domain of civil procedure. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 15(2), 436-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/15.2-3.436
Thiel, S.E. (2000). Choice of law and the home court advantage: Evidence. American Law and Economics Review, 2(2), 291–317.
Torremans, P., Grušić, U., & Heinze, C. (2017). Cheshire and North’s Private International Law. Oxford University Press.
United Kingdom, Amin Rasheed Shipping Corp v. Kuwait Insurance Co 1984 AC 50 HL.
United Kingdom, Bonython v. Commonwealth of Australia 1951 AC 201.
United Kingdom, Re J (A Minor) 1990 2 AC 562 570.
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 1988. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09951_e_ebook.pdf
United Kingdom, Robinson v. Bland 96 Eng Rep 129 KB 1755.
US Uniform Commercial Code, 2017.
Van Rooyen, J.C.W. (1972). Die Kontrak in die Suid-Afrikaanse Internasionale Privaatreg. Juta.
Zhang, M. (2018). Habitual residence v. domicile: A challenge facing American conflicts of laws. Maine Law Review, 70(2), 161–178.
