Hanh Hong Pham*
Tuan Van Vu**
Common Heritage of Mankind Principles Applied to Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction
Suggested citation:
Pham, H.H., & Van Vu, T. (2022). Common Heritage of Mankind Principles Applied to Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Lex Portus, 8(6), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.8.6.2022.1
*PhD, Dean of Public International Law Department, International Law Faculty, Hanoi Law University (87 Nguyen Chi Thanh St., Dong Da ward, Hanoi city, Vietnam)
**PhD, Lecturer, Faculty of Legal Foreign Languages, Hanoi Law University (87 Nguyen Chi Thanh St., Dong Da ward, Hanoi city, Vietnam)
ABSTRACT
The current political tension among developed states and developing nations regarding the exploration, exploitation, benefit-sharing, and conservation of marine genetic resources (MRGs) in ungoverned areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) requires a new marine, regulative regime, which is considered as the premise for the creation of the international consensus of promulgating the ‘Common Heritage of Mankind’ principle (CHM). This study employed desk research methods to synthesize, compare, and analyze UNCLOS (1982), Nagoya Protocol (2014), ongoing ILBI sessions, and other recent studies to figure out the regulatory gap within the Law of the Sea under UNCLOS. By carefully generalizing and scrutinizing the documentation, the study strongly emphasizes the necessity to implement the CHM principle in ABNJ instead of promoting the concept of ‘first come, first served’ basis for the sake of the equitable sharing of benefits, and the conservation of MGRs in ABNJ for the current and future generations. The study also provides the connotations of CHM principle, which serves theoretical basis for some marine management approaches. Consequently, these perspectives stem from a representative developing state with a long coastal line – Vietnam. The general, theoretical, and practical viewpoints would significantly contribute to current and future international law-making process with respect to the formulation of a new legal marine regime for regulating the exploitation, equitable access, and conservation of MGRs in ABNJ according to the ideal concept of CHM principle thereof.
The keywords: common heritage of mankind, conservation, marine generic resources, areas beyond national jurisdiction, international legally binding instrument.
REFERENCES
Anisimov, I. O., & Guliaeva, E. E. (2022). Legal Framework of Marine Genetic Resources: Filling the Gaps of the United Nation Convention on the Law of the Seas. Journal Juridical Opinion, 20(34), 164–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.p164-179.2022
Arbitral Tribunal (2016). The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China). PCA Case No 2013-19 in the matter of the South China Sea arbitration. https://www.pcacases.com/pcadocs/PH-CN%20-%2020160712%20-%20Award.pdf
Aseeva, A. (2019). Rethinking Conservation of Marine Biodiversity Beyond National Boundaries: Justice, Property, and the Commons. Georgetown Environmental Law Review, 32(1), 443–487. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/environmental-law-review/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2022/04/GT-GELR220002.pdf
Berry, D. S. (2021). Unity or Fragmentation in the Deep Blue: Choices in Institutional Design for Marine Biological Diversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.761552
Bourrel, M., Thiele, T., & Curriec, D. (2018). The common of heritage of mankind as a means to assess and advance equity in deep sea mining. Marine Policy, 95, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.017
Brunei Darussalam’s Preliminary Submission concerning the Outer Limits of its Continental Shelf (12/5/2009). http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/preliminary/brn2009preliminaryinformation.pdf
Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Executive Summary of the Joint Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf pursuant to Article 76, paragraph 8 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 in Respect of the Southern Part of the South China Sea (May 2009): 5, http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvnm33_09/mys_vnm2009excutivesummary.pdf
Conciliation Commission (2018). PCA Case No 2016-10 in the matter of the maritime boundary between Timor-Leste and Australia (the “Timor sea conciliation”). https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2327
Dirhamsyah (2021). Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ): Indonesian Perspective as an Archipelagic State. International Conference on the Ocean and Earth Sciences: Earth and Environmental Science, 789, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/789/1/012020
Elferink, A. G. O. (2012). Governance Principles for Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 27, 205–259. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180812X633618
Franckx, E. (2010). The International Seabed Authority and the Common Heritage of Mankind: The Need for States to Establish the Outer Limits of their Continental Shelf. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 25(4), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180810X525377
Hannigan, J. (2016). The Geopolitics of Deep Oceans. Polity Press Polity Press. Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK.
Harris, L. R., Holness, S., Finke, G., Kirkman, S., & Sink, K. (2019). Systematic Conservation Planning as a Tool to Advance Ecologically or Biologically Significant Area and Marine Spatial Planning Processes. In J. Zaucha & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime Spatial Planning (pp. 71–96). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_4
International Court of Justice (2012). Territorial Dispute and Maritime Delimitation (Nicaragua v. Colombia). https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/124/17180.pdf
International Court of Justice (2021). Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/161/161-20211012-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K. M., & Ardronc, J. A. (2017). Conserving the common heritage of humankind – Options for the deep-seabed mining regime. Marine Policy, 78, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.019
Johnston, M. G. (2019). Marine Genetic Resources in the Area beyond National Jurisdiction. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 7(3), 51–79. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Michael-Gavin-Johnston.pdf
Landlocked Countries. https://www.geographyrealm.com/landlocked-countries/
Leary, D. (2018). Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction: Do We Need to Regulate Them in a New Agreement? Maritime Safety and Law Journal – Special Issue on Ocean Commons, 5, 22–47. https://www.marsafelawjournal.org/contributions/marine-genetic-resources-in-areas-beyond-national-jurisdiction-do-we-need-to-regulate-them-in-a-new-agreement/
Long-Sutehall, T., Sque, M., & Addington-Hall, J. (2010). Secondary analysis of qualitative data: a valuable method for exploring sensitive issues with an elusive population? Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(4) 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987110381553
Lucia, V. D. (2018). The Concept of Commons and Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Maritime Safety and Law Journal – Special Issue on Ocean Commons, 5, 1–21. https://www.marsafelawjournal.org/contributions/the-concept-of-commons-and-marine-genetic-resources-in-areas-beyond-national-jurisdiction/
Lucia, V. D. (2020). The Question of the Common Heritage of Mankind and the Negotiations towards a Global Treaty on Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: No End in Sight? McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law, 16(2), 138–157. https://cutt.ly/ZM8IlTr
Member of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://www.oecd.org
Mickelson, K. (2019). Common Heritage of Mankind as a Limit to Exploitation of the Global Commons. The European Journal of International Law, 30(2), 635–663. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz023
Molenaar, E. J., & Oude, E. A. G. (2009). Marine protected areas in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The pioneering efforts under the OSPAR Convention. Utrecht Law Review, 5(1), 5–20. http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.92
Mossop, J., & Schofield, C. (2021). Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction and the Limits of the Commons. In Marine Biodiversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, 285–306. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422438_016
Nguyen (2017). Urgent need for marine spatial planning. https://theleader.vn/nhu-cau-cap-thiet-quy-hoach-khong-gian-bien-20170603102223751.htm
Note Verbale from the Republic of Indonesia to the Secretary – General of the United Nations, No.480/POL-703/VII/10. (8 July 2010). https://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvnm33_09/idn_2010re_mys_vnm_e.pdf
Nurbintoro, G., & Nugroho, H. B. (2016). Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction: Current Debate and Indonesia’s Interest. Indonesia Law Review, 6(3), 283–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v6n3.213
Ogley, R. C. (1981). The law of the sea draft convention and the new international economic order. Marine Policy, 5(3), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(81)90051-8
Rabone, M., Harden-Davies, H., Collins, J. E., Zajderman. S., Appeltans, W., Droege, G., Brandt, A., Pardo-Lopez, L., Dahlgren, T. G., Glover, A. G., & Horton, T. (2019) Access to Marine Genetic Resources (MGR): Raising Awareness of Best-Practice Through a New Agreement for Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ). Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00520
Remarks by Tommy T. B. Koh, of Singapore President of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. ‘A constitution for the Ocean’. Final session of the Conference at Montego Bay, (p. xxxiii). https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/koh_english.pdf
Schoenberg, P. L. (2009). A Polarizing Dilemma: Assessing Potential Regulatory Gap-Filling Measures for Arctic and Antarctic Marine Genetic Resource Access and Benefit Sharing. Cornell International Law Journal, 42(2), 271–299. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol42/iss2/6
Scovazzi, T. (2020). The Rights to Genetic Resources beyond National Jurisdiction: Challenges for the Ongoing Negotiations at the United Nations. In: The Law of the Seabed (pp. 213–237). Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391567_012
Socialist Republic of Vietnam, ‘Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Socialist Republic of Vietnam transmitted to the Arbitral Tribunal in the Proceedings between The Philippines and the People’ Republic of China’ (Dec. 14, 2014, para. 4), reproduced in Supplemental Written Submission of the Philippines, vol. VIII, Annex. 468. https://iuscogen.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/statement-of-mofa-of-vietnam-to-the-tribunal.pdf
Summary of the First Session of the Intergovernmental Conference on an International Legally Binding Instrument under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: 4-17 September 2018, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 25(179), 3. http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb25179e.pdf
The Global North/South Divide. https://www.rgs.org/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?nodeguid=9c1ce781-9117-4741-af0a-a6a8b75f32b4&lang=en-GB
The Member States of the Group of 77. https://www.g77.org
The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Indonesia to the United Nations (2020). https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mys_12_12_2019/2020_06_12_IDN_NV_UN_002_ENG.pdf
The South China Sea Arbitration Case. https://www.pcacases.com/pcadocs/PH-CN%20-%2020160712%20-%20Award.pdf
Tillera, R., Santo, E. D., Mendenhall, E., & Nyman, E. (2018). The once and future treaty: Towards a new regime for biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Marine Policy, 99, 239-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.046
Tladi, D. (2019). An institutional framework for addressing marine genetic resources under the proposed treaty for marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19, 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09449-4
U.N. 77th session of the UN General Assembly. (Mar. 28th, 2022). Report from the Secretary General on Oceans and the law of the sea. UN Doc. A/77/68. Para 1. (p. 1). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N22/302/84/PDF/N2230284.pdf?OpenElement
U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). Article 2. Use of the terms. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity (2005). Marine and coastal biological diversity. Status and trends of, and threats to, deep seabed genetic resources beyond national jurisdiction, and identification of technical options for their conservation and sustainable use. Subsidiary body on scientific, technical and technological advice, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/11/11. https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-11/official/sbstta-11-11-en.pdf
U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity (2014). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/abs/
U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity (Jul. 13th, 2020). Specialized International Access and Benefit-sharing Instruments in the Context of Article 4, Paragraph 4, of the Nagoya Protocol, CBD/SBI/3/14. p. 8-9. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/da8e/bfd0/25b28a1dd4c538d33add17bf/sbi-03-14-en.pdf
U.N. General Assembly A/Res/25/2749. (1970). Declaration of Principles Governing the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor, and the Subsoil Thereof, beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction. http://www.un-documents.net/a25r2749.htm
U.N. Oceans & Law of the Sea. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
U.N. Office for Outer Space Affairs (1979). Resolution adopted by the general assembly 34/68. Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies. https://www.unoosa.org/pdf/gares/ARES_34_68E.pdf
U.N. reports of international arbitral awards (2018). Award in the Arbitration regarding the Chagos Marine Protected Area between Mauritius and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XXXI/359-606.pdf
U.N. Seventy-sixth session A/76/L.46 (2022). Intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. https://www.un.org/bbnj/fifth_substantive_session
United Nations (2019). United nations convention on the law of the sea. Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General, chap. XXI in "Status of Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General”. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/UNCLOS%20Status%20table_ENG.pdf
Vadrot, A. B. M., Langlet, A., & Tessnow-von, I. W. (2021). Who owns marine biodiversity? Contesting the world order through the ‘common heritage of humankind’ principle. Environmental Politics, (31)2, 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1911442
Vo, S. T., Hua, T. T., & Phan, K. H., (2019). A study of coral reef resilience and implications of adaptive management and rehabilitation in Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(1), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1377-7
Wang, C. (2021). On the Legal Status of Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Sustainability, 13(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147993
Wang, C., & Chang, Y. (2020). A new interpretation of the common heritage of mankind in the context of the international law of the sea. Ocean and Coastal Management, 191, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105191
Warner, R. M. (2014). Conserving marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction: co-evolution and interaction with the law of the sea. Frontiers Marine Science, 1(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2014.00006
Wright, G., Rochette, J., Druel, E., & Gjerde, K. (2015). The long and winding road continues: Towards a new agreement on high seas governance, Study N°01/16. Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI). https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/import/publications/st0116_gw-et-al._high-seas.pdf
Wolfrum, R., (2012). Common heritage of mankind. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (pp. 452-458). Oxford University Press.
Ye, Y., & Cochrane, K. (2011). Global overview of marine fishery resources. Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 569. https://www.fao.org/3/i2389e/i2389e.pdf
