Tetyana Malyarenko*
Ukraine – China Asymmetric Economic Power Relations: What is to Come after BRI?
Suggested citation:
Malyarenko, T. (2024). Ukraine – China Asymmetric Economic Power Relations: What is to Come after BRI? Lex Portus, 10(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.62821/lp10201
Published online: 21.05.2024
*Doctor of Public Administration, Jean Monnet Professor of European Security, Institute for East and Southeast European Studies, University of Regensburg (Universitätsstraße 31, Regensburg, Germany)
ABSTRACT
This article analyzes the dynamics of the Ukraine – China asymmetric power relations in the areas of economic cooperation and infrastructure projects, with said relations having been affected by a gray rhino event, namely the Russo-Ukrainian armed conflict. I argue that both China and Ukraine have adapted to the disruption of transit routes – in particular, the functioning of the Belt and Road Initiative – affected by the hostilities in the territory of Ukraine and international sanctions imposed on Russia and Belarus. China, as a more powerful actor, through its active economic diplomacy and diversification strategy, has managed to obtain additional benefits from wartime trade with Ukraine and the reorientation of transit routes through Eurasia. Ukraine, as a less powerful actor, lost its status as a transit state, which constituted its natural geo-economic niche in the 1990s and 2000s; nevertheless, the country’s connectivity with the world for the export of Ukrainian agricultural products are ensured through European Union (EU)-funded Solidarity Lanes and the Black Sea Grain Initiative. Although the Ukrainian economy has been functioning in crisis mode during the war, the postwar reconstruction of Ukraine’s transit potential is likely to depend on the extensive EU – China cooperation based on mutually beneficial connectivity programs. The exact nature of Ukraine – China cooperation, however, depends on the timing and results of the Russo-Ukrainian war.
Keywords: connectivity, trade, cooperation, China, Ukraine.
REFERENCES
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2020). National Economic Strategy of Ukraine 2030. https://nes2030.org.ua/
Chugunov, I., Makohon, V., Titarchuk, M. & Кrykun, T. (2023). The budget policy of Ukraine under martial law. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(1).2023.01
DiyaBusiness. (2022). Exports of Ukraine in 2022: main trends, sectors and regions. https://export.gov.ua/news/4570-eksport_ukraini_u_2022_rotsi_golovni_tendentsii_sektori_ta_regioni#:
European Commission. (2023a). Connecting Europe Facility. https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/programmes/connecting-europe-facility_en
European Commission. (2023b, June 20). EU Approach to Enhance Economic Security. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_3358
European Parliament. (2013). Regulation on Union Guidelines for the Development of the Trans-European Transport Network and Repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (No 1315). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013R1315
Hrynevych, O., Blanco Canto, M., & Jiménez García, M. (2023). The war effect: a macro view of the economic and environmental situation of Ukraine. Applied Economics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2212975
Hussein, H., & Knol, M. (2023) The Ukraine War, Food Trade and the Network of Global Crises. The International Spectator, 58(3), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2211894
Joint Communication on Connecting Europe and Asia – Building Blocks for an EU Strategy, 2018. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/joint_communication_-_connecting_europe_and_asia_-_building_blocks_for_an_eu_strategy_2018-09-19.pdf
Kapitonenko, M. (2021). The rise of China: impact on international security. Strategic Panorama, 1–2, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.1-2.2021.09
Kapitonenko, M. (2023). Why did Russia invade Ukraine? Plausible theoretical explanations. Strategic Panorama, 2, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.2.2022.01
Keuper, M. (2022). The Implications of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine on the Future of Sino-European Overland Connectivity. Austria Institute fur Europa-und-Suherheitspolitik, 6.
Kivalov, S. (2023). The “Sea Factor” in Regional Cooperation: The Impact of the Russo-Ukrainian War. Lex Portus, 9(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.9.2.2023.2
Malyarenko, T. (2021). China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Contested Eastern Neighborhood: A Case Study of Ukraine. Lex Portus, 7(2), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.7.2.2021.3
Malyarenko, T., & Wolff, S. (2021). Pawns, Partners, and “Smart Leadership”: Ukraine’s Opportunities in the China-Russia-West Triangle. PONARS policy memo, 700. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/pawns-partners-and-smart-leadership-ukraines-opportunities-in-the-china-russia-west-triangle/
Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2023a). Infographic (Export). https://www.me.gov.ua/Documents/List?lang=uk-UA&id=e3c3c882-4b68-4f23-8e25-388526eb71c3&tag=TendentsiiEksportuInfografika-eksport-
Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2023b). Infographic (Import). https://www.me.gov.ua/Documents/List?lang=uk-UA&id=7e82c6e6-e65b-44ae-8a9a-48b6851f6d47&tag=Infografika-import-
National Institute for Defense Studies. (2014). China Security Report, 2013. https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/chinareport/index.html
Terajiama, A. (2021, December 3). China’s Skyrizon sues Ukrainian government for $4.5 billion over failed Motor Sich bid. The Kyiv Independent. https://kyivindependent.com/chinas-skyrizon-sues-ukrainian-government-for-4-5-billion-over-failed-motor-sich-bid/
Tuliakov, V., Alekseievska, H., & Yakubovskiy, S. (2023). The impact of the Association agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on mutual trade and Ukrainian ports cargo. InterEULawEast, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2023.10.1.1
Ukrstat. (2019). Dynamics of foreign trade in services by types. https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2008/zd/dseip/dseip2007_u.htm
U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Military and Security Development Involving People’s Republic of China: Annual Report. https://media.defense.gov/2023/Oct/19/2003323409/-1/-1/1/2023-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA.PDF
Voznyak, H., Kaplenko, H., Koval, V., Druhova, V. & Mulska, O. (2023). Financial self-sufficiency of Ukrainian territorial communities and local economic development: Modeling the causal relationship. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(2), 17–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.02
Worldbank. (2021). World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). https://wits.worldbank.org
Wong, A. (2023). China’s Economic Statecraft: Lessons Learned from Ukraine. The Washington Quarterly, 46(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2023.2188830
Yakubovskiy, S., Dominese, G., Rodionova, T., & Kachanovska, M. (2021). International Migration as a Factor of Economic Development of Central, Eastern and Southern Europe. Journal Transition Studies Review, 28(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.14665/1614-4007-28-2-002
