Anatolii Kormych*
Volodymyr Zavalniuk**
Oleg Todoshchak***
Oleksiy Ulianov****
Ukraine’s Europeanization of Public Administration and Harmonizing Customs Legislation – Exploring a Pluralistic Approach
Suggested citation:
Kormych, A., Zavalniuk, V., Todoshchak, O., & Ulianov, O. (2024). Ukraine’s Europeanization of Public Administration and Harmonizing Customs Legislation – Exploring a Pluralistic Approach. Lex Portus, 10(4), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.62821/lp10402
Published online: 21.09.2024
*Associate Professor, Department of General Theory of Law and State, National University Odesa Law Academy (23, Fontanska Doroha St., Odesa, Ukraine)
**Professor, Department of General Theory of Law and State, National University Odesa Law Academy (23, Fontanska Doroha St., Odesa, Ukraine)
***Associate Professor, Department of Administrative and Financial Law, National University Odesa Law Academy (23, Fontanska Doroha St., Odesa, Ukraine)
****Associate Professor, Department of Professional and Special Disciplines, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs (1, Uspenska St., Odesa, Ukraine)
ABSTRACT
The article examines the application of the concept of legal pluralism to the interaction between the European Union (EU) administrative legal order and the administrative legal orders of associated or candidate States as part of the process of aligning national legislation with EU standards. This process involves multiple sources of integration obligations derived from the Association Agreement, accession negotiations, conditions for economic aid, administrative cooperation, and EU-funded modernization programs. The authors suggest that a pluralistic approach may provide associated or candidate States with a degree of flexibility in choosing specific scopes, models, and time frames to align their national legislation with EU laws. This can help to mitigate and offset the imbalance in States’ relations with the EU resulting from the latter’s normative dominance. At the same time, various sources can lead to conflicts between integration obligations and approaches to harmonizing national administrative rules and practices.
Keywords: legal pluralism, public administration, European integration, political arrangements, administrative law, customs law, Ukraine.
REFERENCES
Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, June 27, 2014. OJ. L 161, 29.5.2014, 3–2137. http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2014/295/oj
Austers, A. (2016). From the EU’s Economic Presence to Successful Europeanisation: Theoretical Insights. In A. Austers, I. Bruge, A. Spruds (Eds.), Dilemmas of Europeanisation: Political Choices and Economic Transformations in the Eastern Partnership Countries (pp. 13–39). Latvian Institute of International Affairs and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Avbelj, M. (2006). The EU and the Many Faces of Legal Pluralism toward a Coherent or Uniform EU Legal Order? Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, 2(1), 377–391. https://hrcak.srce.hr/28527
Barber, N. W. (2006). Legal Pluralism and the European Union. European Law Journal, 12, 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00319.x
Bohman, J. (2004). Constitution Making and Democratic Innovation: The European Union and Transnational Governance. European Journal of Political Theory, 3(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885104043586
Chamon, M. (2012). The Influence of ‘Regulatory Agencies’ on Pluralism in European Administrative Law. Review of European Administrative Law, 5(2), 61–91. https://www.uitgeverijparis.nl/reader/192030/6874
Cremona, M., & Leino, P. (2017). Introduction: The New Frontiers of EU Administrative Law and the Scope of Our Inquiry. European Papers: A Journal on Law and Integration, 2(2), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/165
Cruz, B. J. (2008). The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement. European Law Journal, 14(4), 389-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00419.x
De Lucia, L. (2012). Administrative Pluralism, Horizontal Cooperation and Transnational Administrative Acts. Law. Review of European Administrative Law, 5(2), 17–45. https://www.uitgeverijparis.nl/reader/192030/6823
Dickson, J. (2012). Towards a Theory of European Union Legal Systems. In J. Dickson, & P. Eleftheriadis (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (pp. 25–53). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588770.003.0002
Eriksen, E. (2018). Political differentiation and the problem of dominance: Segmentation and hegemony. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12263
EU4PFM. (2024, July 16). Achieved results – Customs. https://eu4pfm.com.ua/newsroom/achieved-results/achieved-results-customs/
European Commission. (2022a, June 17). Commission Opinion on Ukraine’s application for membership of the European Union. Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and The Council (COM(2022) 407 final). https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/c8316380-6cb6-4ffd-8a84-d2874003b288_en?filename=Ukraine%20Opinion%20and%20Annex.pdf
European Commission. (2022b, September 5). Ukraine: New agreements on closer cooperation between the EU and Ukraine on customs and taxation. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/news/ukraine-new-agreements-closer-cooperation-between-eu-and-ukraine-customs-and-taxation-2022-09-05_en
European Commission. (2023, November 8). Ukraine 2023 Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/s/zWLI
European Council. (2022, June 23). European Council conclusions on Ukraine, the membership applications of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia, Western Balkans and external relations. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/23/european-council-conclusions-on-ukraine-the-membership-applications-of-ukraine-the-republic-of-moldova-and-georgia-western-balkans-and-external-relations-23-june-2022/
European Council. (2024, June 21). Ministerial meeting opening the Intergovernmental Conference on the Accession of Ukraine to the European Union. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/hzmfw1ji/public-ad00009en24.pdf
European Parliament. (2021). Resolution of 11 February 2021 on the implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Ukraine (2019/2202(INI)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0050_EN.html
European Parliament and Council. (2021, March 11). Regulation (EU) establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013 (2021/444). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/444/oj
Extension of Public Finance Management Support Programme for Ukraine (EU4PFM). Central Project Management Agency. https://cpva.lt/en/project/extension-of-public-finance-management-support-programme-for-ukraine-eu4pfm
Golia, A., & Teubner, G. (2021). Networked statehood: an institutionalised self-contradiction in the process of globalisation? Transnational Legal Theory, 12(1), 7–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2021.1927608
Handrlica, J. (2020). Is There an EU International Administrative Law? A Juristic Delusion Revisited. European Journal of Legal Studies, 2(2), 79–116. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2019.025
IMF. (2024, June 28). Ukraine: Fourth Review of the Extended Arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility, Request for Modifications of a Performance Criterion, and Financing Assurances Review-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Ukraine. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2024/06/28/Ukraine-Fourth-Review-of-the-Extended-Arrangement-under-the-Extended-Fund-Facility-Request-551207
Kirchmair, L. (2018). Who Has The Final Say? The Relationship between International, EU and National Law. European Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 47–100. http://ejls.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2018/11/3.-EJLS-Special-Issue-2018-Kirchmair.pdf
Kivalov, S. (2022). Administrative Penalties for Customs Infringements in Ukraine: Wandering Sideways. Lex Portus, 8(4), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.8.4.2022.2
Kormych, L., Krasnopolska, T., & Kormych, A. (2024). Public Image of Ukrainian Customs: Trying to Lead a Camel through the Eye of a Needle. Lex Portus, 10(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.10.1.2024.2
Law on amendments to the Customs Code of Ukraine and other laws of Ukraine regarding some issues of implementation of chapter 5 of section IV of the Association Agreement (No. 2510-IX), 2022. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2510-20#Text
Mac Amhlaigh, C. (2018). The anatomy of constitutional pluralism in the European Union. In G. Davies, & M. Avbelj (Eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (pp. 59–77). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433091.00011
MacCormick, N. (1995), The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now. European Law Journal, 1(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00031.x
Matei, L., Matei, A., Zanoschi, D., & Stoian, O. (2010). Comparative Studies on the Administrative Convergence Revealed by national Strategies of Administrative Reform in Some South-Eastern European States. AEI. http://aei.pitt.edu/15146/
Ministry of Finance. (2024, March 04). On the way to the EU: the first working meeting on the development of the new Customs Code of Ukraine based on the EU Customs Code was held in Kyiv. Government Portal. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/na-shliakhu-do-ies-u-kyievi-vidbulasia-persha-robocha-zustrich-shchodo-rozrobky-novoho-mytnoho-kodeksu-ukrainy-na-osnovi-mytnoho-kodeksu-ies
Neve, J. de. (2007). The European Onion? How Differentiated Integration is Reshaping the EU. Journal of European Integration, 29(4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701502498
Openaid. (n.d.). EU4PFM Ukraine 2019 – 2024. https://openaid.se/en/contributions/SE-0-SE-6-11372#description
Pickett, E., & Wolffgang, H.-M. (2024). The European Commission’s Proposal for a Modernised Union Customs Code: A Brief Introduction. World Customs Journal, 17(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.55596/001c.90961
Radyshevska, O. (2020). Administrative law of Ukraine in the conditions of Europeanization. Talkom.
Schakel, A. H. (2020). Multi-level governance in a ‘Europe with the regions.’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120937982
SCSU. (n.d.). Convention on Common Transit Procedure and Ukraine. https://customs.gov.ua/en/rezhim-spilnogo-tranzitu-ncts
Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 375–411. https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLRev/2008/20.pdf
Trondal, J. (2020). Public Administration and the Study of Political Order: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3264
Twining, W. (2000). Globalisation and Legal Theory. Northwestern University Press.
von Bogdandy, A. (2014). Common principles for a plurality of orders: A study on public authority in the European legal area. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(4), 980–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou066
Walker, N. (2005). Legal Theory and the European Union: A 25th Anniversary Essay. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi031
Walker, N. (2018). Pluralism then and now. In G. Davies, & M. Avbelj (Eds.), Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (pp. 407–410). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433091.00032
Wollenschläger, F. (2017). Constitutionalisation and Deconstitutionalisation of Administrative Law in View of Europeanisation and Emancipation. Review of European Administrative Law, 10(1), 7–79. https://www.uitgeverijparis.nl/nl/reader/199912/1001322674
Wolthuis, B., Crum, B., Oleart, A., & Overeem, P. (2023). Democracy and pluralism after European integration: Incorporating the contested character of the EU. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2023.2216043
Zysset, A. (2015). Legal and Moral Pluralism: A Rejoinder (in European Human Rights Law). Oslo Law Review, 2(3), 176–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/oslaw2765
